Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 588
Filtrar
4.
Ginebra; Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2024. (WHO/Diph/Clinical/2024.1).
em Espanhol | WHO IRIS | ID: who-376242
5.
Genève; Organisation mondiale de la Santé; 2024. (WHO/Diph/Clinical/2024.1).
em Francês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-376241
8.
Geneva; World Health Organization; 2024. (WHO/Diph/Clinical/2024.1).
em Inglês, Árabe, Chinês, Russo | WHO IRIS | ID: who-375887
9.
Toxicol Pathol ; 51(1-2): 77-80, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37083209

RESUMO

Nonclinical toxicity testing (GLP) of prophylactic vaccines to support human clinical trials is outlined in the World Health Organization nonclinical vaccine-development guidelines, which are followed by most regulatory agencies globally. Vaccine GLP toxicity studies include at least two groups: a buffer control (often phosphate-buffered saline) group and a highest anticipated clinical dose formulation group. However, studies may include additional groups, including lower-dose formulation groups and adjuvant-containing formulation control groups. World Health Organization guidelines touch upon expectations for dose group and tissue selection for microscopic evaluation, but there is variation in the interpretation of this aspect of these guidelines between vaccine developers. This opinion piece proposes a scientifically based approach for defining appropriate groups to evaluate in the dosing and recovery phases in nonclinical vaccine toxicity studies, as well as suggestions on selecting tissues for microscopic evaluation at the recovery phase of studies to promote alignment between vaccine manufacturers.


Assuntos
Testes de Toxicidade , Vacinas , Humanos , Testes de Toxicidade/métodos , Vacinas/toxicidade
19.
Geneva; World Health Organization; 2023. (WHO/UCN/GMP/2023.01 Rev. 1).
em Inglês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-373339
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...